Lifeday coverage of oral anticoagulants and one-year relative survival in patients with atrial fibrillation: a population-based study in Estonia.

BACKGROUND: Routine oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended for almost all high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation, yet registries show that OACs are still underused. Our aim was to study the lifeday coverage (LDC) of OAC prescriptions and its relationship with one-year mortality rates of AF patients aged ≥ 65 in Estonia for the years 2019 and 2020. METHODS: Medical data for AF patients aged ≥ 65 years from 2018 and alive as of 01.01.2019 (cohort I) and new AF documentation from 2019 and alive as of 01.01.2020 (cohort II) was obtained from the Health Insurance Fund's electronic database. The data was linked to the nationwide Estonian Medical Prescription Centre's database of prescribed OACs. For LDC analysis, daily doses of guideline-recommended OACs were used. The patients were categorized into three LDC groups: 0%, 1-79%, and ≥ 80%. The data was linked to the Estonian Causes of Death Registry to establish the date of death and mortality rate for the whole Estonian population aged ≥ 65. RESULTS: There were 34,018 patients in cohort I and 9,175 patients with new AF documentation (cohort II), previously not included in cohort I. Of the patients, 77.7% and 68.6% had at least one prescription of OAC in cohorts I and II respectively. 57.4% in cohort I and 44.5% in cohort II had an LDC of ≥ 80%. The relative survival estimates at 1 year for LDC lifeday coverage groups 0%, 1-79%, and ≥ 80% were 91.2%, 98.2%, and 98.5% (cohort I), and 91.9%, 95.2%, and 97.6% (cohort II), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clear indications for OAC use, LDC is still insufficient and anticoagulation is underused for stroke prevention in Estonia. Further education of the medical community and patients is needed to achieve higher lifeday coverage of prescribed OACs.

Markers of Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Fibrosis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice. The pathogenesis of AF is linked to inflammatory reaction and oxidative stress, which leads to fibrosis of the atria and progression of the disease. The purpose of this study was to define the role of several biomarkers of inflammation, fibrosis, and oxidative stress (OxS). We included 75 patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF, who were admitted for electrical cardioversion or pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), galectin-3 (Gal-3), myeloperoxidase (MPO), oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were measured before the procedures. We compared the results with those of 75 healthy age-, sex-, and blood pressure-matched individuals. The patients were followed up for 1 year after the intervention to establish the recurrence of AF and its association with the measured markers. Patients with AF had higher MPO (52.6 vs. 36.2 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP (209.0 vs. 28.0 pg/ml, p < 0.001) compared to healthy subjects. Also, they showed significantly higher levels of hsCRP (1.5 vs. 1.1 mg/l, p = 0.001) and Gal-3 (11.4 vs. 9.7 mg/l, p = 0.003), while there was no difference found in oxLDL (71.5 vs. 71.7 U/l, p = 0.449). MPO (OR = 1.012, p = 0.014), hsCRP (OR = 1.265, p = 0.026), and weight (OR = 1.029, p = 0.013) were independently associated with AF in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Patients with successful maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) for one year had lower baseline MPO (40.5 vs. 84.3 ng/ml, p = 0.005) and NT-proBNP (127.5 vs. 694.0 pg/ml, p < 0.001) compared to patients with recurrent AF episodes, but there was no difference in hsCRP, Gal-3, or oxLDL between them. MPO (OR = 0.985, p = 0.010) was independently associated with AF recurrence during the follow-up period when adjusted for cofounders. Patients with AF had increased markers of inflammation and fibrosis, while there was no increase detected in the OxS marker oxLDL. MPO was independently associated with AF in a multivariate model. Inflammatory and fibrotic mechanisms are important factors in electrical and structural remodelling progress in the atria of patients with AF.

Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased central blood pressure and arterial stiffness.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and beta blockers (BBs) are the drugs of choice for rate or rhythm control in these patients. The purpose of this study was to describe differences in arterial stiffness (AS), central blood pressure (cBP), and the role of BBs on cBP in patients with AF compared to healthy individuals. The authors included 76 patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and cBP were measured and compared with data from 75 healthy individuals. Patients with AF had higher PWV (8.0 m/s vs. 7.2 m/s, p < .001), central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) (118 mm Hg vs. 114 mm Hg, p = .033), central pulse pressure (cPP) (39 mm Hg vs. 37 mm Hg, p = .035) and lower pulse pressure amplification (PPA) (1.24 vs. 1.30, p = .015), without differences in peripheral blood pressure (pBP) and heart rate (HR). AF patients had significantly increased PWV (ß= 0.500, p = .010, adjusted R² = 0.37) after adjustment for confounding factors. The use of BBs significantly reduced PPA (ß = -0.059, p = .017, adjusted R² = 0.30). AF patients have higher PWV, cSBP, cPP, and lower PPA, compared to healthy patients. These findings support the role of AS in the development of AF. Use of BBs is related to a potential adverse effect on cBP.

Unrecognised cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: is it time to act earlier?

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most significant prognostic factor in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, a significant number of individuals may develop CVD that does not present with the classic angina-related or heart failure symptoms. In these cases, CVD may seem to be 'silent' or 'asymptomatic', but may be more accurately characterised as unrecognised diabetic cardiac impairment. An initial step to raise awareness of unrecognised CVD in individuals with T2D would be to reach a consensus regarding the terminology used to describe this phenomenon. By standardising the terminologies, and agreeing on the implementation of an efficient screening program, it is anticipated that patients will receive an earlier diagnosis and appropriate and timely treatment. Given the availability of anti-diabetic medications that have been shown to concomitantly reduce CV risk and mortality, it is imperative to improve early identification and initiate treatment as soon as possible in order to enable as many patients with T2D as possible to benefit.